Here’s a surprising royal revelation: Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis will never inherit their family’s ‘forever home,’ Forest Lodge. While it’s common for parents to pass down property to their children, Prince William and Princess Kate’s situation is anything but ordinary. But why? And this is the part most people miss... The eight-bedroom Forest Lodge isn’t actually owned by the royal couple—it’s part of the Crown Estate, leased to them by the monarchy. That’s right: even royalty rents their homes! This means the children can’t inherit what their parents don’t own. But here’s where it gets controversial... While William and Kate pay a ‘market rate’ for the lease—a stark contrast to Prince Andrew’s recent scandal over his ‘peppercorn rent’ at Royal Lodge—they’ve also invested their personal funds into extensive renovations. From minor external updates to internal alterations, the family has transformed Forest Lodge into their dream home. So, if they’re pouring money into it, why can’t it stay in the family? The answer lies in the complexities of royal property ownership, a topic that’s sparked debates about fairness and tradition. Speaking of fairness, let’s talk about Windsor—the family’s chosen location. It’s not just any town; it’s the UK’s top-ranked place to live in the 2025 Vitality Index, boasting excellent health, economy, and living standards. But for William and Kate, it’s personal. Their children are settled at Lambrook School nearby, and they’re close to Windsor Castle for royal duties. Forest Lodge offers the space they need, a far cry from palace life. But here’s the real question: Is it fair that royal children can’t inherit their family home? While Prince George won’t inherit Forest Lodge, he’s set to receive something far grander: the Duchy of Cornwall, a vast property portfolio including farms, holiday lets, retail parks, and entire communities like Poundbury in Dorset. As the future Duke of Cornwall, he’ll become Britain’s largest private landowner. But does this make up for not having a ‘forever home’ to call his own? Let us know your thoughts in the comments—is this tradition outdated, or is it a necessary part of royal protocol?
